<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo, the gadget guide. So much in love with shiny new toys, it's unnatural.]]></description>
				        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ T-Mobile Says Voice and Messaging Service Is Restored [Tmobile] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Yep, you should be all good&mdash;if you're not, let us know ASAP. Check out the full story including the carrier's most recent statement <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396460/t+mobile-confirms-nationwide-service-outage">here</a>.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396635/t+mobile-says-voice-and-messaging-service-is-restored]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396635]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Tmobile ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nationwide tmobile outage]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Outages]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:58:01 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396635&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Roca's Latest Concept Brings 3D Video Into The Shower [Concept] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_waterdrop3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />I love <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395601/this-bathroom-concept-is-probably-a-transformer-in-disguise">funky bathroom concept designs</a>, so naturally I adore the Roca Waterdrop Shower Room. Granted, who wouldn't want to be surrounded by a 3D touchscreen while showering? Be it news or naughty shower flick, you'll truly soak it in.</p> <p>The touchscreen is the main appeal of this shower, not just because it provides the 3D experience, but because it controls everything from water temperature and jet intensities to video and sound. Yes, 3D and jets. Perfect combination.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5396603,3,''); </script></p> <p>It's been a while since there was a concept I wanted to turn into reality this much, but to be honest, I wouldn't even know what movie I'd want to watch first in there. [<a href="http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/10/29/star-in-your-own-3-d-shower-movie/">Yanko Design</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396604/rocas-latest-concept-brings-3d-video-into-the-shower]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396604]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Concept ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3D]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Bathroom]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[roca]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Roca waterdrop 3d shower room]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Shower]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Waterdrop]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396604&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Welcome To The Company, Here's Your 1980s Cubicle [Image Cache] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/retroffice.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_retroffice.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Don't get me wrong, I think the 1980s were fantastic, great music and all, but I'm not so sure that I'd want to be put into a truly old-school cubicle like this on my first day on the job.</p> <p>I'm told that a fellow was led into this retro cubicle the day he started work at a new company. No ideas about which company it was and whether they ever brought him back into this decade. [<a href="http://imgur.com/M5of4">Imgur</a> &mdash;<i>Thanks, Matt!</i>]</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/retroffice2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_retroffice2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396589/welcome-to-the-company-heres-your-1980s-cubicle]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396589]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Image cache ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[1980]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cubicle]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Old school cubicle]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pranks]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Retromodo]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396589&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Woman To Live Stream Her Child Birth [Wrongmodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/preggers.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_preggers.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>People have posted videos of deliveries before, but this Lynsee girl has decided on a live video stream when she gives birth to her first child. I'm OK with over-sharing now and then, but this could be too much.</p> <p>So far Lynsee has blogged every detail of her pregnancy for mommy blog, Moms Like Me, but now she's taken them up on an offer to live stream the labor and childbirth for all of the Internet to see. There are promises that it'll be "tasteful" and that only already registered users of the blog will be able to make comments on the live stream, but I'm a bit weary of the entire event.</p> <p>Don't misunderstand, I'm not prudish about seeing some girl parts, nor am I squeamish about watching a live birth, but I do wonder how the Internet community will react. [<a href="http://www.boston.com/community/moms/blogs/child_caring/2009/11/first_time_mom_plans_to_give_birth_live_on_the_internet.html">Boston</a> via <a href="http://www.switched.com/2009/11/03/woman-to-broadcast-her-childs-birth-live-on-the-web/">Switched</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396574/woman-to-live-stream-her-child-birth]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396574]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Wrongmodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[childbirth]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Live-streamed childbirth]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wtf]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396574&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why) [Remainders] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Google and the Phantom Town of Argleton...10 Years of Steve Jobs' Apple Product Unveilings...AT&T's Foray Into In-Car Satellite TV Goes Miserably Wrong...Robots Will Soon Learn How to Smell Fear</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/340x_Argleton_upon_Google.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p> <h2>Google and the Phantom Town of Argleton</h2> <p>For ages, map makers have protected their own maps by adding little landmarks and towns that don't exist, sort of a hiding-in-plain-sight watermark. Well, the Telegraph UK reported that it had spotted one such town in a Google Map, which was using Tele Atlas data. Argleton, in Lancashire, simply doesn't exist, even though you can <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=argleton,+lancashire,+uk&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&gl=us&ei=pvrwSvbEE4O4swPo3_DdDg&ved=0CBsQ8gEwBA&hq=&hnear=Argleton,+Lancashire,+United+Kingdom&ll=53.544592,-2.911034&spn=0.174625,0.341949&z=12">plainly see it</a>. What happened? Apparently, the name was quite possibly sucked up with other data when Tele Atlas' map makers were busy inputting info from old maps. This isn't unusual, though you'd think there'd be a more rapid fact checking process. By the way, we didn't cover it because nowadays, the story isn't really whether or not Tele Atlas is stealing maps from old dead cartographers, but whether or not <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391966/google-and-the-deadly-power-of-data">Google is stealing the map business from Tele Atlas</a>. [<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/6474746/Mystery-of-Argleton-the-Google-town-that-only-exists-online.html">Telegraph UK</a> via <a href="http://gawker.com/5396270/is-google-using-pilfered-maps">Valleywag</a>]</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/340x_iPod_unveiling.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p> <h2>10 Years of Steve Jobs' Apple Product Unveilings</h2> <p>MacLife created a choppy but thorough video of Steve Jobs unveiling everything from the original CRT iMac to the video-camera equipped iPod Nano, with bits of Schiller thrown in out of necessity. It's a fun encyclopedic romp (though I'm sure some of you can tell me what's missing). The biggest reason we didn't post it? We didn't want to be sued for all the fanboys who suffered heart attacks&mdash;or the ones who maybe escaped cardiac arrest but came away with Teen Wolf palms. [<a href="http://www.maclife.com/article/videos/imac_iphone_video_trip_down_keynote_memory_lane">MacLife</a> via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/jobs-announcements">9to5Mac</a>]</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/340x_CruiseCast_RIP.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p> <h2>AT&T's Foray Into In-Car Satellite TV Goes Miserably Wrong</h2> <p>After four months up and running, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5128657/att-cruisecast-20-satellite-tv-channels-for-the-car">CruiseCast satellite-TV service for cars</a> bit the dust hard, with refunds and paid un-installations going out to current subscribers. What was AT&T and its partner, RaySat, thinking when they launched it? $1300 up front and no major sports channels or adult programming to speak of? That just doesn't&mdash;excuse me, didn't&mdash;make sense. Good thing zero point zero readers fell for it. Right guys? [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/atandt-cruisecast-satellite-service-halts-activations-will-refund/">Engadget</a>]</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/340x_Smell_of_Fear_Drebin_Terminator.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p> <h2>Robots Will Soon Learn How to Smell Fear</h2> <p>Just as drug-sniffing dogs can be replaced by machines that aren't so prone to smack addiction, scientists are developing sensors&mdash;nowhere near ready but due in 2012&mdash;that home in on the pheromone released when people experience stress or fear. Like what Leslie Nielsen must have felt when he got that call from OJ, asking about the <em>Naked Gun</em> 10-year reunion. [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/fear-detector-pick-out-fearful-criminal-crowd">PopSci</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396558/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396558]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Remainders ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Apple Keynote]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Argleton]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[At&t]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[CruiseCast]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Fear]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gizmodo remainders]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[jobsnote]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Leslie Nielsen]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Mapping]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Naked gun]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[OJ Simpson]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[RaySat]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Robots]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Satellite TV]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smell]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smell of fear]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[smelling]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Tele Atlas]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Uk]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396558&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Air Conditioning Bill Too High? Should've Moved Into A Building Like This [Architecture] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_chrome_2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Apparently the oddly arranged 600 mm diameter circular windows on this building are not a hidden message from aliens, but instead a clever way to create ambiance indoors while saving up to 25% on air conditioning costs.</p> <p>Those opaque windows combined with the concrete "fins" on the side of the building act as a heat barrier and reduce cooling costs dramatically. I just don't know if the savings are worth the mockery for living in a chunk of Swiss cheese, even if it's a pretty chunk of Swiss cheese. [<a href="http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.projectview&upload_id=12606">WAN</a>]</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5396417,3,''); </script></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396545/air-conditioning-bill-too-high-shouldve-moved-into-a-building-like-this]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396545]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Architecture ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Chrome hotel]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Concept]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hotel]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sanjay puri]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:50:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396545&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Eliminate Scratches On Your iPhone's Bezel With A Sponge [Fix-it] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bezel.jpg"></a><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NtLSeVx_q1I&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NtLSeVx_q1I&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>I abused my iPhone and it's got the marks to tell the stories. The most annoying though are the scratches on the pretty silver bezel. Thankfully, as <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5395933/brush-your-iphones-bezel-to-hide-scuffs-and-scratches">Lifehacker shows us</a>, those can easily be eliminated using a kitchen sponge.</p> <p>As you can see in the video, all that you really need to do is smoothly stroke the bezel with the rough (usually green) scrubbing surface of a kitchen sponge. This'll make the scratches blend in by creating a more brushed look. Just don't forget to use masking tape to protect the rest of the phone and it's the simplest cosmetic surgery you'll ever do.</p> <p>While I don't know how my iPhone will cope with losing his manly bezel battle scars, I do know that he'll at least look far more handsome again. Is anyone joining me in using this trick? [<a href="http://justanotheriphoneblog.com/wordpress/iphone-modding/10-minute-project-giving-your-iphone-bezel-a-brushed-look">Just Another iPhone Blog</a> via <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5395933/brush-your-iphones-bezel-to-hide-scuffs-and-scratches">Lifehacker</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396525/eliminate-scratches-on-your-iphones-bezel-with-a-sponge]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396525]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Fix-it ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Brush]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[DIY]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Iphone bezel]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Iphone bezel brush up]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Scratches]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[sponge]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396525&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ DIY Wrist-Mounted Flamethrower Lets You Pretend To Be An X-Man [DIY] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/pyro.JPG"></a><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/z2oEP3RWppA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/z2oEP3RWppA&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Pyro was never my favorite of the X-Men, but that doesn't mean I'm not excited about this DIY project allowing me to mimic his powers. It's called Prometheus, and it's by far one of the best wrist-mounted flamethrowers I've seen.</p> <p>We've seen this guy's work <a href="http://gizmodo.com/383561/x+man-wannabe-student-builds-wrist+mounted-flamethrower">before</a>, but nothing actually produced such a controlled flame or came with building instructions as detailed as Everett Bradford's new Prometheus Device. And while I know that Pyro technically controls fire rather than actually making it, short of mutant genetics, this project is as close as we'll get. And it's damn awesome. [<a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/Everett.Bradford/Prometheus#">Prometheus</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/11/functioning_x-men_pyro_costume_flam.html">Make</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396426/diy-wrist+mounted-flamethrower-lets-you-pretend-to-be-an-x+man]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396426]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DIY ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Fire]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Flamethrower]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Prometheus]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[pyro]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pyro wrist-mounted flamethrower]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Xmen]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396426&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Cheap, Printed Solar-Powered LEDs Could Change 1.5 Billion Lives [Solar Power] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/solarpan.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_solarpan.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #photovoltaiccells" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/photovoltaiccells/">Photovoltaic cells</a> printed on sheets aren't news, nor are LEDs and ultrathin lithium batteries. What's news is a combination of the three which can help give light to 1.5 billion people who live in impoverished areas without access to electricity.</p> <p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #frederikkrebs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/frederikkrebs/">Frederik Krebs</a> came up with this combination of solar panels and LED lights which, while definitely a work-in-progress, could bring cheap light to some of the world's poorest regions. I call the lamps a work-in-progress because despite being durable enough to last several years, they run at a mere 1% efficiency. But with the expected final cost of $7 a piece, they're full of life-changing potential, despite that low efficiency.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_solarpan2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p> <p>Some prototypes of the lamps are currently being tested in Zambia. As seen in the picture, the solar panels are left laying flat during the day and then rolled up (and secured with snap-button) into a cone-shaped lamp. I'm definitely looking forward to seeing the results of the prototype tests and a final product, because no one should go without artificially lit nights. [<a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/green-tech/solar/plastic-solar-cells-roll-into-unlit-villages">IEEE Spectrum</a> via <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-11/solar-powered-leds-light-grid-african-villages">Pop Sci</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396403/cheap-printed-solar+powered-leds-could-change-15-billion-lives]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396403]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Solar Power ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Frederik Krebs]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lamps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Led]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[photovoltaic cells]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Printed solar led]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Solar]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Solar led]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396403&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Moron In Breathalyzer Costume Busted For Driving Drunk [Crime] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/breathalyzer_costume_bust.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Ever since I first saw the <a href="http://www.buycostumes.com/Breathalyzer-Adult-Costume/19156/ProductDetail.aspx">breathalyzer costume</a> a few years ago, I knew it was only a matter of time before some frat boy was busted for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #drunkdriving" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/drunkdriving/">drunk driving</a> wearing one. That day has arrived.</p> <blockquote> <p>According to a police report, 18-year-old James N. P. Miller, of Cincinnati, was seen driving the wrong way out of the entrance to a one-way street at East Park Place in Oxford.</p> <p>Officers executed a traffic stop and found that Miller was wearing a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/breathalyzer/">breathalyzer</a> costume [I assume they laughed their asses off]. After investigation, police said, Miller was found to be operating a vehicle while intoxicated.</p> <p>Inside his car, officers allegedly found an open container of Bud Light in the center console.</p> <p>Officers also found what was left of a case of Bud Light in the passenger side front seat and in the trunk.</p> </blockquote> <p>The legal limit in Ohio is .08 BAC&mdash;Miller tested at .158. He was cited for operating a vehicle while intoxicated (among other violations) and released to his girlfriend. Hopefully, she realizes that there isn't much of a future being with the "blow here" breathalyzer mug shot guy. [<a href="http://www2.nbc4i.com/cmh/news/crime/article/man_in_breathalyzer_costume_arrested_on_suspicion_of_dui/25923/">NBC4i</a> via <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/03/man-in-breathalyzer.html">Boing Boing</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396262/moron-in-breathalyzer-costume-busted-for-driving-drunk]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396262]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Crime ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Breathalyzer]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Breathalyzer costume]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Costume]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Drunk Driving]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396262&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ T-Mobile Confirms Nationwide Service Outage [Tmobile] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_T-Mobile_Service_Disruption.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />There's a confirmed T-Mobile service outage affecting users nationwide. People are reporting that all calls are failing with busy tones or getting dropped instantly, despite full signal bars. <b>Updated: T-Mobile says that voice and messaging service is restored.</b></p> <p>As <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=T-Mobile">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://forums.t-mobile.com/tmbl/board/message?board.id=General&thread.id=6168">forums</a> are filled with annoyance over the issue, T-Mobile is assuring us that they are aware of the problem and working on it:</p> <blockquote> <p>T-Mobile customers may be experiencing service disruptions impacting voice and data. Our rapid response teams have been mobilized to restore service as quickly as possible. We will provide updates as more information is available.</p> </blockquote> <p>We're waiting on further information from T-Mobile and will update as we learn more.</p> <p><b>Update 1:</b> Several commenters are reporting that both incoming and outgoing calls are working if routed through Google Voice.</p> <p><b>Update 2:</b> Many reports that T-Mobile @Home is out as well.</p> <p><b>Update 3:</b> We got a note from a T-Mobile spokesperson:</p> <blockquote> <p>We're making good progress restoring voice and messaging service to affected customers. At this time, approximately 5 percent of T-Mobile customers are experiencing service disruptions. Issues began at approximately 5:30 p.m. Eastern time. Our rapid response team is working continuously to fully resolve this disruption. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience that this has caused our customers</p> </blockquote> <p><b>Update 4:</b> The latest word from T-Mobile:</p> <blockquote> <p>We continue to work on restoring full services for the small percentage of affected Customers. Please stay tuned for the latest updates. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience that this has caused our customers.</p> </blockquote> <p><b>Update 5:</b> T-Mobile says the fix is in, but the cause is still a mystery:</p> <blockquote> <p>T-Mobile confirms it has fully restored voice and text/picture messaging services for customers affected by intermittent service disruptions on Tuesday. About five percent of our customers across various geographies were affected for much of Tuesday evening, and by late Tuesday PST their service was restored. Our sole focus has been restoring full services for all customers; we are now investigating the root cause of the incident. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience that this has caused our customers.</p> </blockquote> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396460/t+mobile-confirms-nationwide-service-outage]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396460]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Tmobile ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Nationwide tmobile outage]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Outages]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:29:15 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396460&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Ultimate iPhone Waste of Time [IPhone] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/MillionTapChallengeTitle.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Some people spend countless hours watching reality TV shows. Others like to collect leaves. Then there are a few who enjoy watching the washing machine go round. And lastly, there are those who play Million Tap Challenge on their iPhones.</p> <p>This 99 cent app has only a blank screen and one objective: Tap your screen one million times. Stupid, you say? Madness? Who is going to spend a dollar in something as absurd as this? Apparently, plenty of people. Not only that, but there's even a worldwide high score table which I simply refuse to believe. I'm sorry, but I just don't even want to think about the possibility of someone spending almost three days of their life tapping 844,683 times. My faith in Humanity is pretty damaged as it is. [<a href="http://KRAPPS.com/2009/10/30/million-tap-challenge-iphone-app/">Krapps</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396378/the-ultimate-iphone-waste-of-time]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396378]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Challenge]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iPhone Apps]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Million]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[tap]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396378&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Create Your Own Tesla Coil Musical With the ArcAttack Emulator [Tesla Coils] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/arcattack_emulator.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_arcattack_emulator.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you visited the Giz Gallery this year, you might have witnessed the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5367329/arcattack-lightning+proof-musicians-share-their-tesla-coil-secrets">electrifying (and slightly terrifying) musical spectacle that is ArcAttack</a>. Well, now they have an <a href="http://www.arcattack.com/stce.php">emulator on their website</a> that allows you to make music of your own.</p> <p>Of course, you may not be able to play something as complex as the themes from your favorite video games, but you might be able to put together a little rendition of <em>Chopsticks</em> or <em>Funkytown</em> without having to worry about electrocuting yourself. Hit the link to give it a shot. [<a href="http://www.arcattack.com/stce.php">ArcAttack</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396321/create-your-own-tesla-coil-musical-with-the-arcattack-emulator]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396321]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ tesla coils ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ArcAttack]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Emulator]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lightning]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396321&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 31 Views Inside the Workings of Our Gadgets [Photoshop Contest] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_insidegadgetstop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />For this week's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #photoshopcontest" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/photoshopcontest/">Photoshop Contest</a>, I asked you to show us how your gadgets <i>really</i> work. We all know there's something fishy that makes everything run, and it turns out that thing involves Chuck Norris and animals making shadow puppets.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5396357,31,''); </script></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396381/31-views-inside-the-workings-of-our-gadgets]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396381]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Photoshop Contest ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Contests]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396381&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Disposable Laptop Works Better as a Metaphor Than as an Actual Product [Concepts] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_displap.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />There's no doubt about it: Today, the concept of a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #disposablelaptop" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/disposablelaptop/">disposable laptop</a> is totally ridiculous. But you know what else was ridiculous? Disposable cameras, <a href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/04/05/the-first-disposable-camera/">60 years ago</a>. And this thing just <em>looks</em> fantastic, so I'll let it slide. Also: symbolism!</p> <p>There are a lot of holes you could poke in this concept, like the flippant use of meaningless terms like "bio chip" and buzzwords like "convergence" and "high technology," and the fact that by the time vital components like the battery and display are cheap enough to throw away&mdash;that'll be 2020, according to the designer's completely arbitrary calculations&mdash;laptops, or whatever we're using, probably won't be shaped like this.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5396376,3,''); </script></p> <p>But if you think about it, we're heading toward this kind of design anyway: flimsy, dirt-cheap netbooks seem to have a short intended lifespan, and hell, even my polycarbonate MacBook felt like it was beginning to disintegrate after about two years of heavy use. It may not have been cardboard, but in its own way, it sure <em>felt</em> disposable. [<a href="http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/03/disposable-paper-laptops/">Yanko</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396377/disposable-laptop-works-better-as-a-metaphor-than-as-an-actual-product]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396377]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Concepts ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Disposable laptop]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Disposable laptop concept]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:35:03 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396377&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Own Your Own Starfleet Shuttle Simulator [Spaceships] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>A Utah school is selling off its <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #startrek" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/startrek/">Star Trek</a></i>-inspired USS Galileo, which means this is your chance to own your very own spaceship simulator. It's perfectly practical! [<a href="http://www.publicsurplus.com/sms/all,ut/auction/view?auc=384131">Auction</a> via <a href="http://io9.com/5395746/own-your-very-own-starfleet-shuttle-simulator/gallery/">io9</a>]</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_galileo6.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396123/own-your-own-starfleet-shuttle-simulator/gallery/]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396123]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ spaceships ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Simulator]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396123&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Droid Does Tethering (Or Will, Anyway) [Droid] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Verizon says a tethering plan's coming for Droid sometime next year. Since it uses all of Verizon's standard data rates, that should be an extra $15/month with Verizon's Broadband Access Connect plan&mdash;not too bad, actually. [<a href="http://www.gearlog.com/2009/11/verizon_wireless_tethering_com.php">Gearlog</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396353/droid-does-tethering-or-will-anyway]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396353]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ droid ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[tethering]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:51:32 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396353&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ AT&T Suing Verizon Because "Map" Ad Is Confusing to Dumb People (and Lawyers) [Cellphones] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/VZ_vs_ATT_3G_coverage.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_VZ_vs_ATT_3G_coverage.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375027/verizon-bitch-slaps-att--in-theres-a-map-for-that-commercial">Verizon Wireless ad</a> shows a beefy Verizon 3G map next to a less impressive AT&T 3G map. AT&T is suing, saying it leads people to believe AT&T has no phone service outside of its (admittedly skimpier) 3G areas.</p> <p>Now, the "There's a Map for That" ad focuses on 3G alone, and the discussion is about 3G services, including video. But the charge AT&T makes is that people who watch the ad are being deliberately led to thinking that in the white spaces, there's no AT&T phone service at all. Here's the accusation:</p> <blockquote> <p>Consumers are interpreting the white or blank space on the maps to mean that AT&T customers who are not in an AT&T "3G" coverage area have no wireless coverage whatsoever, and therefore have no ability to use their wireless devices for any purposes in vast areas of the country. This interpretation is not surprising as Verizon, in its own coverage maps, uses white space to inform customers that no coverage of any kind exists.</p> </blockquote> <p>The thing is, this is somewhat tricky to prove, but it sounds wrong. There are areas of Verizon voice coverage that are not marked as red in the map in the commercial, if my squint-eye human-instrument comparison test is accurate. Try it for yourself. Does the map up top better resemble the one in blue and yellow (but not green), which shows broadband, aka 3G? Or the one in red, which shows voice and messaging?</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Verizon_3G_map.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Verizon_3G_map.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Verizon_Voice_coverage_map.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Verizon_Voice_coverage_map.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p>For reference, here's AT&T's map&mdash;note, only the very darkest shade of blue represents 3G coverage:</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/AT_T_coverage_map.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_AT_T_coverage_map.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> <p>The ad may contain jargon that might confuse middle America&mdash;I will admit that&mdash;but to any trained ear, it's pretty clearly about 3G. As far as this maps claim, though, that seems dubious. The maps that Verizon chose do seem to represent the same thing&mdash;3G coverage only. Yes, AT&T lawyers, if I'm right about this, it means that had Verizon cheated, their map would have been <em>even redder</em> than the one in the ad. So what's say we spend more of that iPhone subscription money on fixing the network (near my house, please!) and less money on frivolous lawsuits.</p> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YCbYTrYD5y8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YCbYTrYD5y8&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p> <p>[<a href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/memorandum_of_law-att-vzw.pdf">AT&T's Motion for the Restraining Order of Verizon WARNING: PDF]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396332/att-suing-verizon-because-map-ad-is-confusing-to-dumb-people-and-lawyers]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396332]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Cellphones ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[At&t]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[There's a map for that]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon Wireless]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:46:44 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson Rothman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396332&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Super Spit Balls [Weapons] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_spitballs.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />You're still using paper? Pfft, how 20th century of you. We recommend only <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #spitballs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/spitballs/">Spit Balls</a> branded spit balls, tiny polymer beads that grow up to 200X (and grossly sticky) in your mouth. $6. [<a href="http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp?pn=3151847&bhcd2=1257266762">Scientifics</a> via <a href="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2009/11/03/finally-some-real-innovation-polymer-spit-balls-grow-to-200x-their-original-size/">OhGizmo!</a> via <a href="http://nerdapproved.com/approved-products/spit-balls-grow-up-to-200x-their-original-size-explode-on-target/">Nerd Approved</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396116/super-spit-balls]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396116]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Weapons ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Polymers]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Spit balls]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396116&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Giant Urban Cursor Tracks Its Movements in Google Maps [Google Maps] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/map2-cursor.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />If the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #urbancursor" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/urbancursor/">Urban Cursor</a>&mdash;a giant cursor that captures its movements in <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #googlemaps" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/googlemaps/">Google Maps</a> using GPS&mdash;worked in real life, I would use it to minimize Afghanistan, maximize Sweden, and drag and drop some parts of Madrid to the trashcan.</p> <p>Urban Cursor is an art installation by Danish designer Sebastian Campion. He made it for the festival Ingràvid in Figueres, Spain. As people moved it, sitting on top, the GPS recorded the motion, sending the coordinates to Google Maps and publishing photos. [<a href="http://urbancursor.com/">Urban Cursor</a> via <a href="http://www.designboom.com/weblog/cat/8/view/8043/urban-cursor.html">Design Boom</a>]</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/uc1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_uc1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396181/giant-urban-cursor-tracks-its-movements-in-google-maps]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396181]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Google Maps ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Urban Cursor]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396181&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The TwitterPeek Is So Dumb It Makes My Brain Hurt [Rant] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/twitterpeek.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_twitterpeek.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I still can't believe the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391431/stuff-we-didnt-post-today-and-why/gallery/2">TwitterPeek</a> exists. It's a portable device that <i>only does Twitter.</i> Seriously, who the hell would spend $200 on this? Am I crazy here?</p> <p>The original Peek, which just runs email, is something I would never buy in a million years. But I could understand why some people might like it. It's simple, its inexpensive, and it lets you run email without paying for a fancy smartphone plan. That's fine. Email is important and universally useful.</p> <p>But this? Twitter only? Twitter is something that you can do easily on a smartphone, yes, but it's also something you can use easily on <i>any</i> phone. It's a <a href="http://help.twitter.com/forums/59008/entries/14014">service based on text messaging</a>, for god's sake! In practice, you could use Twitter on your phone <a href="http://twitter.pbworks.com/Mobile-Apps">no matter what phone you have</a>. Hell, even StarTacs supported SMS and could use Twitter, if you happen to still be using one.</p> <p>Maybe they expect this to be used by people without cellphones at all? Why would anyone carry a device that does only Twitter instead of getting a basic free cellphone that can call friends and restaurants and companies with phones (all of them)?</p> <p>And really, if you're so hooked on Twitter than you want to have it on you at all times, the chances are good that you're also hooked on email, IM, texts and probably the services that a few other apps would provide. This is a device built around an app, basically. The iPhone, BlackBerry, Pre, Windows Mobile, Symbian and Android all have great Twitter apps. But do they deserve their own devices? What's next, a dedicated Fieldrunners or Yelp device? How about a batman utility belt full of like 20 devices each doing the equivalent of one app, for seven bucks a month, each?</p> <p>Sure, one could argue that it chooses to do one thing and to do it well, with simplicity and affordability. You could compare it to the Flip, for example, which makes shooting video easy and cheap. But the Flip does far more, for the money, and decent video isn't something you find on most smartphones. The Flip beats camcorders by doing 90% of what they do for 20% of the cost. This does 1% of what smartphones can do for 25% of the cost. It's just not a good value, despite it being cheap.</p> <p>The real kicker? This thing has one single function, and it can't even do that very well. <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2355112,00.asp">PC Mag just gave it 1.5 stars</a>! This is totally damning:</p> <blockquote> <p>But as soon as I started handling the TwitterPeek, I knew something was wrong. This handheld is painfully slow. Scrolling through button selections or on-screen lists, the cursor is always a bit behind your trackwheel.</p> <p>TwitterPeek also fails at the most basic function: reading tweets. The main list of tweets only shows the first three and a half words of each message; to read more, you have to dig down by hitting the 'return' key. Then you can step through tweets, slowly, one by one, with the 'n' (for next) and 'p' (for previous) keys, or jump back up to the unreadable full list of truncated messages. The whole process is slow and annoying.</p> </blockquote> <p>Not everybody wants or needs a smartphone, such as the iPhone or Droid. They're relatively expensive and cost more per month than a dumbphone. But the fact of the matter is, if you're looking to have a lot of mobile functionality, it makes way more sense to consolidate your needs on one well-designed product than to clutter up your pockets with a dumbphone, a TwitterPeek, a digital camera and a GPS unit. This is a device that is built on flawed logic and executed poorly. I can't think of a single person in a single situation where this would make sense.</p> <p>I just can't believe this thing exists.</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396213/the-twitterpeek-is-so-dumb-it-makes-my-brain-hurt]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396213]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Rant ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peek]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[TwitterPeek]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396213&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Rest In Peace, Ridiculous Dual-Screen OLPC XO-2 [Obits] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/xolaptop20.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_xolaptop20.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It has always been an unspoken fear&mdash;or assumption, even&mdash;that the dual-touchscreen followup to the original OLPC, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/392060/olpc-xo-laptop-20-has-dual-touchscreens-looks-amazing-and-future+y">XO-2</a>, would never come to pass. But we let the dream live! Until today: the XO-2 is <a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/02/negroponte-outlines-the-future-of-olpc-hints-at-paperlike-design-for-third-generation-laptop/2/">officially scrapped</a>.</p> <p>Almost worse than the news that we'll never see this folding, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/343446/olpc-is-fd-defected-xo-laptop-designer-plans-new-75-laptop">hybrid LCD/E ink</a> budget computer in the flesh is how the news was delivered: By Nick Negroponte, in a low-profile interview with <a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/02/negroponte-outlines-the-future-of-olpc-hints-at-paperlike-design-for-third-generation-laptop/2/">Xconomy</a>, as if it everyone already knew:</p> <blockquote> <p>2.0 (the XO-2) has been replaced by two things: 1) model 1.75, same industrial design but an ARM inside, 2) model 3.0, totally different industrial design, more like a sheet of paper.</p> </blockquote> <p>Right, so all those mockups, all the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5125892/negroponte-halves-olpc-staff-phases-out-sugar-linux-to-focus-on-dual+screen-xo">talk</a> of focusing on the next generation product, all that <em>hope</em>, dashed, and replaced an incremental upgrade&mdash;to a faster ARM processor, from the current model's AMD Geode&mdash;and vague promises of a <em>3.0</em> product:</p> <blockquote> <p>3.0 is a single sheet, completely plastic and unbreakable, waterproof, 1/4" thick, full color, reflective and transmissive, no bezel, no holes. 1W. $75, ready in 2012</p> </blockquote> <p>This from the guy who just vaporized a year and a half of buildup for his last project with a passing comment, so take it with a grain of salt.</p> <p>Whatever happens next&mdash;and mind you, things <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5125892/negroponte-halves-olpc-staff-phases-out-sugar-linux-to-focus-on-dual+screen-xo">aren't looking too great</a> for the project as a whole&mdash;this is a sad situation. As ambitious as the project was, and as little chance as it ever had to come to pass, it was a rare phenomenon: it was genuinely cool, tied to a reputable organization and conceived with a good cause in mind. And now it's dead. [<a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/02/negroponte-outlines-the-future-of-olpc-hints-at-paperlike-design-for-third-generation-laptop/2/">Xconomy</a> via <a href="http://www.olpcnews.com/people/negroponte/negroponte_xo-175_goes_arm_xo-2_is_cancelled.html">OLPC News</a> via <a href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/olpc-scraps-xo-2-dual-screen-laptop-moves-toward-arm-based-xo-1-75.html">Liliputing</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396273/rest-in-peace-ridiculous-dual+screen-olpc-xo+2]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396273]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Obits ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Concepts]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Laptops]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[nicholas negroponte]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Olpc]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Olpc xo-2]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[One Laptop Per Child]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Oplc 3.0]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Sad]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[XO-2]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:18:28 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396273&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Gadget Deals of the Day [Dealzmodo] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/Dealz-November3.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_Dealz-November3.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Even George Costanza himself would see the merit in this deal: buy any individual season of Seinfeld for $15 or get the whole series for $120. Also, check out the rare $200 savings on the latest generation Apple MacBook.</p> <p><br clear="all"> <br> <b>Top Deals:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-133-macbook-latest-gen-226ghz-2gb-ram-250gb-hdd-deals/2450">13.3" MacBook Unibody Laptop (Latest Generation) for $799.99</a> (normally $999 - use <a href="http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0321997#rebate">this form</a>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/seinfeld-single-seasons-1-9-on-dvd-14-99-each">Seinfeld, Seasons 1-9 for $15 each or $120 together</a> (normally $20 each, $137 complete series).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/177196/moon-globe-for-iphone-ipod-touch/">Moon Globe (iPhone) for $0</a> (- use <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=333180321&mt=8">this form</a>).</p> <p><b>Computing and Peripherals:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/183631">17.3" HP dv7t Intel Core i7 Laptop for $949.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1349 - use coupon code: <b>NBSW451897</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-hp-dv6t-16-laptop-with-core-i7-quad-processor-windows-7-deals/2402">16" HP dv6t Core i7 Laptop for $949.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1349 - use coupon code <b>NBSW451897</b>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/hp-dv6z-16-inch-2-1ghz-4gb-laptop">16" HP dv6z Laptop for $580 plus free shipping</a> (normally $750 - use coupon code <b>SVMY478761</b>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/lenovo-g550-15-6-inch-3gb-ram-core-duo-led-laptop-with-windows-7">16" Lenovo G550 Windows 7 LED Laptop for $449 plus free shipping</a> (normally $659 - use coupon code <b>USP11EVERY</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-133-macbook-latest-gen-226ghz-2gb-ram-250gb-hdd-deals/2450">13.3" MacBook Unibody Laptop (Latest Generation) for $799.99</a> (normally $999 - use <a href="http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0321997#rebate">this form</a>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/lenovo-thinkpad-x200-12-1-inch-core-2-duo-laptop">12" Lenovo ThinkPad X200 Laptop for $1,003 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1,594 - use coupon code <b>USPX1250</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/samsung-2494sw-24-widescreen-1080p-lcd-monitor/">24" Samsung 2494SW 1080p LCD for $219.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $260).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-dell-sp2309w-23-widescreen-hd-lcd-monitor-deals/2371">23" Dell SP2309W Widescreen LCD with Webcam for $229.00 plus free shipping</a> (normally $319).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-hanns-g-hw-191apb-19-lcd-monitor-deals/2472">19" Hanns-G 281-APB LCD for $99.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $130 - use coupon code <b>EMCMMLP43</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-cavalry-caxb3701t0-1tb-external-hard-drive-deals/584">1TB Cavalry CAXB3701T0 External HD for $75.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $129 - use <a href="http://ak.buy.com/buy_assets/retail/pdfs/09Q4/1027-1105dk-bk_20cavalry.pdf">this form</a>).<br> • <a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/183656">Iomega Select 320GB Portable External HD for $59.99</a> (normally $69)<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4749">Altec Lansing FX3022 Expressionist BASS 2-Way Speaker for PC and MP3 for $54.99</a> (normally $85.86).<br> • <a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/183635">HP Photosmart Premium TouchSmart Color Inkjet Printer for $129.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $149 - use coupon code: <b>SVMY478761</b>).</p> <p><b>Gaming:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/ratchet-clank-future-a-crack-in-time-ps3/">Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack In Time (PS3) for $49.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $54 - use coupon code <b>RATCHET3</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/demons-souls-ps3-49-99/">Demon's Souls (PS3) for $49.99</a> (normally $57).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4762">Killzone 2 (PS3) for $34.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $53.98).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4763">Resistance 2 Collector's Edition (PS3) for $39.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $74.34).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4767">Watchmen: The End is Nigh, The Complete Experience (Blu-ray/PS3) for $19.99</a> (normally $27.99).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4765">Borderlands (360/PS3) for $49.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $54.48).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/golden-axe-beast-rider-360/">Golden Axe: Beast Rider (360) for $12.98</a> (normally $19.99).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4760">Golden Axe: Beast Rider (360) for $12.98</a> (normally $19.99).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4761">Rock Band 2 (360/PS3/Wii) for $19.99</a> (normally $33.94).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/large-memory-foam-video-game-chair/">Memory Foam Gaming Chair for $102.99</a> (normally $120).</p> <p><b>Home Entertainment:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-sony-bravia-kdl-55v5100-55-1080p-120hz-lcd-tv-deals/2256">55" Sony BRAVIA KDL-55V5100 1080p 120Hz LCD TV for $1,649.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1746).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-samsung-ln52b630-52-inch-1080p-120hz-lcd-tv-deals/2091">52" Samsung LN52B630 1080p 120Hz LCD TV for $1,399.00 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1489 - use coupon code <b>SAMSUNG90</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-samsung-ln46b750-46-inch-1080p-240hz-lcd-tv-deals/1531">46" Samsung LN46B750 1080p 120Hz LCD TV for $1,159 plus free shipping</a> (normally $1399 - use coupon code <b>LN46B750</b>).<br> • <a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/183664">42" Philips 42PFL3704D/F7 1080p LCD HDTV for $629.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $699).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/lg-electronics-26lf10-26-inch-720p-lcd-hdtv">26" LG 720p LCD HDTV for $333 plus free shipping</a> (normally $449).<br> • <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/pr/cheap-polk-audio-surroundbar360-dvd-home-theater-system-deals/2471">Polk Audio SurroundBar360 Home Theater System for $469.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $800 - use coupon code <b>HTB11243</b>).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/seinfeld-single-seasons-1-9-on-dvd-14-99-each">Seinfeld, Seasons 1-9 for $15 each or $120 together</a> (normally $20 each, $137 complete series).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4768">Traitor with Digital Copy (Blu-ray) for $9.99</a> (normally $21.63).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4769">Sunshine Cleaning (Blu-ray) for $9.99</a> (normally $29.33).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/western-digital-wd-tv-mini-media-player/">Western Digital WD TV Mini Media Player for $59.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $80).</p> <p><b>Personal Portables and Peripherals:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.techbargains.com/news_displayItem.cfm/183686">Canon EOS Rebel XSi SLR Digital Camera for $643.71 plus free shipping</a> (normally $851).<br> • <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/flip-video-120-min-ultrahd-camcorder/">Flip Video UltraHD Camcorder for $154.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $179).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4770">Nextar SNAP7 Portable GPS Navigator for $199.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $495.95).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4773">Magellan Maestro 4040 Portable GPS Navigator for $298.01 plus free shipping</a> (normally $353).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4752">Able Planet Clear Harmony Active Noise Cancelling Headphones NC1000CH for $149.99 plus free shipping</a> (normally $220.38).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/77449/creative-zen-x-fi-25-8gb-media-and-mp3-player/">Creative ZEN X-Fi Media Player for $100 plus free shipping</a> (normally $115).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/176823/kensington-k38036us-rechargeable-pocket-booster-battery-charger/">Kensington K38036US Rechargeable Pocket Battery Charger for $17 plus free shipping</a> (normally $35).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/177082/koss-portapro-portable-headphone/">Koss PortaPro Portable Headphone for $33 plus free shipping</a> (normally $46).<br> • <a href="http://dealzon.com/deals/keurig-b30-mini-brewing-system-black">Keurig B30 Mini Brewing System for $70 plus free shipping</a> (normally $80 - use coupon code <b>EMCMMLP86</b>).</p> <p><b>Hobomodo:</b><br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=4764">Ricochet Xtreme (PC) for $0</a> (normally $6.99 - download <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001K7HUR8/?tag=mmbevigaotst-20">here</a>).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3708">BIG SOUND 2009 Summit 20 Track Sampler for $0</a> (download <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002LOAHEC/ref=nosim/mmbevigaotst-20">here</a>).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/177196/moon-globe-for-iphone-ipod-touch/">Moon Globe (iPhone) for $0</a> (use <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=333180321&mt=8">this form</a>).<br> • <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com/forums/freebies/30023-subscription-flying-magazine-mercury-magazines.html">1 Year Subscription for Flying Magazine for $0</a> (use <a href="http://www.mercurymagazines.com/pr1/101/101300">this form</a>).</p> <p><i>If a deal looks too good to be true, investigate the store and see if it's a good, reputable place to buy. Safe shopping!</i></p> <p>[<i>Thanks <a href="http://www.techdealdigger.com/">TechDealDigger</a>, <a href="http://www.dealzon.com/">Dealzon</a>, <a href="http://www.fatwallet.com/">Fat Wallet</a>, <a href="http://www.gamerhotline.com/">GamerHotline</a>, <a href="http://www.cheapcollegegamers.com/">Cheap College Gamers</a>, <a href="http://www.cheapstingybargains.com">CheapStingyBargains</a> and <a href="http://www.techbargains.com">TechBargains</a>.]</i></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396146/gadget-deals-of-the-day]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396146]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Dealzmodo ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Dealz]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gadget dealz]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gadget dealz of the day]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Hobomodo]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle VanHemert]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396146&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Motorola Droid Review [Review] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s90shots__069.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s90shots__069.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's this simple: If you don't buy an iPhone, buy a Droid.</p> <p>It's the best phone on Verizon, and with <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android20/">Android 2.0</a>, the second best smartphone you can buy, period. It's flawed, deeply in some ways. But it's the second best phone around, on the best network around.</p> <p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391825/motorola-droid-first-hands-on-its-a-terminator">Droid is a champion</a> of possibilities: for Motorola, for Verizon, for Android 2.0. It exists to show you what each of them can really do. You can kind of think of it like a Super G1, laying out what it means to be an Android 2.0 phone, with powerful new processors and delicious new displays with sky-high resolutions. If Droid is merely the first in a new wave, we have a lot to be excited about.</p> <h1>The Shiny New OS</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/hooooome.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_hooooome.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The main attraction for Droid is Android 2.0, the remarkably updated mobile OS from Google. It's so important, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human">it gets its own review</a>. After all, you will start to see it on other phones soon. It's what makes Droid so great&mdash;new navigation app, new contacts/social network syncing, better email management, better browser&mdash;but also why Droid still falls short of the iPhone, particularly when it comes to managing music and video. If there's something you don't see here, chances are we discussed it in the earlier piece&mdash;if you care about the phone, you're gonna want to read <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human">the full software review</a> too.</p> <h1>Design and Build</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s90shots__062.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s90shots__062.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It didn't hit me until last weekend why Droid's design struck such an emotional chord with me. Was it the functionalist, industrial masculinity, expressed perfectly through glass and metal and unapologetic angles, in a powerful phone that's remarkably streamlined? It's all of that, yes. But it's also the fact that aesthetic is rendered black and gold metal accents, which is why it taps into something deep and profoundly affective from my childhood:<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/batmandroid.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_batmandroid.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br clear="all"> It's practically cheating. I can't not love the design of this phone.</p> <h1>Oh, That Screen</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/drooooooid__019.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drooooooid__019.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Droid's 3.7-inch, 854x480 display with an eye-popping pixel density of 267ppi, is the kind of screen you ache for. An analogy: Do you remember how amazing you thought Nintendo 64 games looked, ten years ago? Have you looked at them lately? Do you remember the sinking feeling you got, realizing just how ugly they are now? That's how'll you'll feel looking at every other phone with the now-standard 480x320 screens we thought were so gorgeous a couple of years ago. They're lo-fi and lifeless by comparison.</p> <p>It's the clarity of the text that captivates. It's true, there've been Windows phones with excellent screens that have the same resolution as Droid, but the font rendering has always been too weak to take advantage of them. Reading ebooks on an iPhone has always given me a headache (so I don't), but with Droid's pixel density, I could read on it for hours. It's that good. The color's fantastic, too, though not Zune HD OLED level.</p> <p>Touch response is mostly effective. When there are misfires, like getting no response when you flick your finger to pull out the app menu, it's hard to tell if it's the phone or the software&mdash;at least until more Android 2.0 phones are out there. But no serious complaints.</p> <h1>Keyboard and Strange Buttons</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s90shots__070.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s90shots__070.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The keyboard is <em>okay</em>. I liked it a lot more on Day 1 than I do today, and that's because I never got any faster. The problem is that the key landscape is too flat and homogenous&mdash;a necessary sacrifice for Droid's remarkable skinniness&mdash;so there's simply no way to feel out precisely what key your thumb's on, meaning I never broke out of having to stare at the keyboard while typing. I found the actual layout to be excellent. Overall, the keyboard works, but you'll probably never fly on it. I'm faster on the landscape touch keyboard, personally.</p> <p>The d-pad's not as dandy as a trackball for getting around, but for navigating around text, it's better than I expected&mdash;despite its puniness, I never pressed the wrong button.</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/drooooooid__007.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_drooooooid__007.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>But I hate the four soft touch buttons on the front of the phone. For one, there are no dedicated phone or end call buttons, so if you accidentally call somebody at 4am, you have to figure out how to end the call exclusively via the software interface. For two, the lack of feedback is annoying, especially if you're holding down the search button trying to activate voice search and it's not coming up. Did you miss the button? Are you pressing it wrong? Who knows? If Android's going to rely hard on these four buttons, the way iPhone relies on the home button, they need to be actual physical objects.</p> <h1>This Camera Sucks</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/droidsample.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_droidsample.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The camera is complete garbage. It takes 10 years to start up, 2 to focus, and another 4 to actually take the goddamn picture. And there's no distinct visual feedback to let you know a photo's been snapped. And the photos suck. That pumpkin shot, in decent lighting, is as good as it gets. Like I said in the Android 2.0 review, I don't know if it's the hardware or the software, but it's inexcusably bad. (<strong>Update</strong>: Here's a couple of more shots from the camera. You can compare the indoors one with the much better Sprint Hero sample shot <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">seen here</a>, since they were taken in the same place.)<br> <script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5396508,2,''); </script><br> Video's not terrible, though, beyond the fussy format even VLC doesn't even like playing:<br> <object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7418856&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7418856&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/7418856.jpg"></a></p> <h1>Performance</h1> <p>Droid's brain is a potent <a href="http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=6123&navigationId=12643&contentId=14649">ARM Cortex A8 TI OMAP 3430</a>&mdash;it's basically the same as the chips inside of the Palm Pre and iPhone 3GS. Like I said in the Android 2.0 review, while it runs apps and multitasks with gusto, basic things like menus and the desktop stutter way too often. It's like driving a Ferrari with a door that groans loudly every time you open it.</p> <h1>Battery Life</h1> <p>With moderate to heavy usage&mdash;browsing, some navigation, push Gmail, moderate app usage, with the occasional app running in the background&mdash;I managed to make it through a full 8-12 hour day before recharging, each day for about a week, though some days were closer than others. Your mileage will vary, depending on how many apps you've got running in the background and how much you hit GPS, but my experience was that it was entirely acceptable for a modern smartphone.</p> <h1>Nuts, Bolts and Stability</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/s90shots__066.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_s90shots__066.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Verizon's network is top notch, and being able to actually use the internet on my phone with impunity in New York is revelatory. In both New York and Seattle testing, reception has been excellent, though around Pittsburgh, it was spottier than expected. Voice quality was pretty excellent whenever we didn't use Google Voice.</p> <p>While definitely stable enough to use as an everyday phone, we did run into a few bugs: GPS accuracy was wildly off-target on more than one occasion, pinpointing our location hundreds of miles away, and the only way to fix it was to reboot the phone (I assume that's a software issue, not a hardware one). We also had one complete crash after finishing a phone call that required a reboot. And more apps stopped responding more often than we were used to on previous versions of Android, requiring a force close.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5396201,12, 'Motorola Droid'); </script><br> <script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5391960,12,'Original Droid Gallery'); </script></p> <h1>Hello, Moto</h1> <p>These things are true about Droid: The camera's not great; the keyboard isn't mindblowing; Android 2.0 lacks the polish and multimedia prowess to completely match the iPhone. What's also true is that a killer design, Google's services, Android's exploding app ecosytem, powerful multitasking, a stunning screen and Verizon's network still make it the second best phone you can buy right now, after the iPhone.</p> <p>At the same time, there's reason to pause. Android is evolving more rapidly than any other smartphone platform, both in terms of the hardware and software. When HTC's Hero came out, it crushed every other Android phone out there. Just a couple short months later, Droid is on top. In four months, we'll probably see a new champion. That Droid sets such a high bar for everything after might be the best thing about it.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplusplus.jpg" width="40" height="20"> Display, display, display<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Um, just look at it<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">A smartphone you actually want on Verizon!<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Keyboard is merely adequate, at best<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_01.jpg" width="20" height="20">Camera is utter garbage<br> <br clear="all"></p> <p>[<a href="http://phones.verizonwireless.com/motorola/droid/">Droid</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396168]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Review ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Cellphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Motorola Droid]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396168&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Xbox 360 With Free $100 Gift Card Deal Might Be Hitting Walmart This Weekend [Rumor] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_walmart_ad.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />A <a href="http://kotaku.com/5395950/xbox-360-with-100-card-for-200-this-weekend">Kotaku tipster</a> supposedly took a screenshot of a Walmart computer displaying a deal that throws in a free $100 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #giftcard" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/giftcard/">gift card</a> with purchase of the $200 <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xbox360" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xbox360/">Xbox 360</a> Arcade system. It also shows a Sony Blu-ray player for $149.</p> <p>This is a rumor of course, but it is something to keep in mind if you have time for a little shopping this weekend. Official word should come within the next day or so. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5395950/xbox-360-with-100-card-for-200-this-weekend">Kotaku</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396211/xbox-360-with-free-100-gift-card-deal-might-be-hitting-walmart-this-weekend]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396211]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Rumor ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Deals]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Dealzmodo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Card]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Xbox 360]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[xbox 360 arcade]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:10:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396211&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The 8-Bit Low-Res Make-Up Is High-Res Clever [Halloween] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/tumblr_ksiijfAUBG1qz8flyo1_1280-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_tumblr_ksiijfAUBG1qz8flyo1_1280-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This 8-bit pixelated makeup and t-shirt is proof that you don't have to be an <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389487/working-apple-iphone-costumes-just-plain-win">extreme overachiever</a> or look <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393730/ghostbuster-proton-pack-uses-real-lasers-can-probably-hunt-real-ghosts">like a dork</a> or a slut to enjoy Halloween. Quite pretty effect. [<a href="http://kindacarsick.com/post/230881676">Kindacarsick</a>&mdash;Thanks <a href="http://obsoletethebook.com/">Anna Jane Grossman</a>]</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/tumblr_ksgf4w2SuN1qz8flyo1_500-2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396145/the-8+bit-low+res-make+up-is-high+res-clever]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396145]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Halloween ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[8-bit Makeup]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pixelated]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Pixelface]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396145&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Blacksn0w App Now Ready, Eager to Unlock Your iPhone 3G and 3GSes [IPhone] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_blacksn0w.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5394324/iphone-os-312-unlock-accomplished-dropping-november-4">Blacksn0w</a>, child of overserious shadow-lurker GeoHot and brother of equally straighforward jailbreak app <a href="%20http://gizmodo.com/5379029/blackra1n-jailbreaks-iphone-os-312">Blackra1n</a>, is now available, and should make unlocking your late-version iPhone 3G or 3GS a dead-simple process. Before you dive in, though, there's <a href="http://www.iphoneos3.com/2009/11/03/download-and-install-blacksn0w-for-iphone-3g-or-iphone-3gs-3-1-2/">one caveat</a>:</p> <blockquote>Apple can permanently patch the blacksn0w exploit in their next firmware update. You must download Cydia's "On File" system in case Apple blocks more exploits in future updates.</blockquote> <p>It's still safe to run the tool, but keep in mind that Apple can&mdash;and probably will&mdash;patch the core exploit used by Blacksn0w, rendering your unlock useless, or worse. Running On File will ensure you can downgrade in the future, so you don't lose whatever precarious carrier/plan/phone arrangement you've so fallen in love with.</p> <p>Mac and PC downloads are available <a href="http://iphonejtag.blogspot.com/">here</a>. [<a href="http://blackra1n.com/">GeoHot</a> via <a href="http://www.iphoneos3.com/2009/11/03/download-and-install-blacksn0w-for-iphone-3g-or-iphone-3gs-3-1-2/">iPhoneOS3</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396208/blacksn0w-app-now-ready-eager-to-unlock-your-iphone-3g-and-3gses]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396208]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ iPhone ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Blackra1n]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[blacksn0w]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[iphone unlock]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Unlock]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:58:35 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396208&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Kmart Black Friday Ad Leaked [Kmart] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/kmart-page-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_kmart-page-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This year's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> ads are starting to trickle in, although Kmart's offerings are characteristically "meh". However, there are a few halfway decent deals like the Xbox 360 Halo bundle for $299 and a 4GB SD Card for $9.</p> <p>Here is a list of the tech deals&mdash;doorbusters are marked with an asterisk.</p> <blockquote> <p><strong>Cell Phones</strong></p> <p>TracFone LG Bluetooth Camera Flip Phone – $19.99</p> <p>Wireless Bluetooth Headset – $7.99</p> <p><strong>Computers</strong></p> <p>Delstar 7 Inch Wireless Netbook 05 Windows CE – $119.99 *</p> <p><strong>Digital Cameras</strong></p> <p>Kodak CD80 Digital Camera Bundle – $79.99</p> <p>Samsung SL40 Digitial Camera – $79.99 *</p> <p>Sony W180 Digital Camera – $99.99</p> <p><strong>DVD Players</strong></p> <p>Magnavox DVD Player w/VCR – $49.99</p> <p>Memorex 1080P HDMI Upconvert DVD Player – $29.99</p> <p>Sylvania 7 Inch Portable DVD Player – $49.99 *</p> <p><strong>Electronics</strong></p> <p>Cobra Radar Detector – $29.99 *</p> <p>Cobra Two Way Radio Pair – $19.99 *</p> <p>Coby 7 Inch Digital Picture Frame – $29.99 *</p> <p>Emerson 3-Handset DECT Phone Bundle – $39.99</p> <p>GPX 2.1 Channel DVD Home Theater System – $39.99</p> <p>iHome Dock – $9.99</p> <p>iHome PC Accessories – $9.99</p> <p>Jazz T20 Camcorder – $19.99</p> <p>Phillips 4-Device Remote Control – $9.99</p> <p>SmartPants 8.5″ Digital Photo Frame – $49.99</p> <p>Sony Earbuds – $4.99</p> <p><strong>Games & Hobbies</strong></p> <p>48″ Air Powered Hockey Table With Electronic Scoring – $39.99 *</p> <p>Bowlercade With Electronic Ball Return And Scoring – $59.99 *</p> <p><strong>GPS Navigation Systems</strong></p> <p>Magellan Roadmate 1220 GPS Navigation System – $84.99 *</p> <p>TomTom ONE 130 GPS – $79.99</p> <p>TomTom XL325S GPS Navigation System – $99.99</p> <p><strong>MP3 Players</strong></p> <p>Element 2GB Stick MP3 Player – $9.99 *</p> <p>Sylvania 4GB MP3 Player – $19.99<br> <strong><br> Televisions</strong></p> <p>Element 26″ LCD HDTV – $249.99</p> <p>Panasonic 42″ 720 Plasma TV – $549.99</p> <p>Sony Bravia L Series 32″ Class 720p LCD HDTV (Model KDL32L504) – $379.99 *</p> <p><strong>Video Games</strong></p> <p>$25 Nintendo Gaming Coupon w/Any DS System Purchase – $0.00</p> <p>Brutal Legend For PS3 – $39.99</p> <p>Brutal Legend For XBox 360 – $39.99</p> <p>Dirt 2 (PS3) – $39.99</p> <p>Dirt 2 (Xbox 360) – $39.99</p> <p>Dragon Age For PS3 – $39.99</p> <p>Dragon Age For XBox 360 – $39.99</p> <p>for PS3 – $199.99</p> <p>Halo 3 OSDT – $39.99</p> <p>High School Musical 3 Dance Bundle – $9.99</p> <p>Left 4 Dead 2 (Xbox 360) – $39.99</p> <p>Nintendo DSi Bundle w/5 Pre-Installed Games – $169.99 *</p> <p>Nintendo Wii – $199.99 [Uh, isn't this the everyday price?]</p> <p>Rock Band 2 Special Edition (XBox 360) – $99.99</p> <p>Sandisk 4GB SD Card – $8.99</p> <p>Select Wii Games – $9.99</p> <p>Select Wii Games – $29.99</p> <p>Value Video Games – $14.99</p> <p>WWE Smackdown Vs Raw 2010 PS3 – $39.99</p> <p>XBox 360 Elite Bundle w/Halo 3 OSDT – $299.99</p> </blockquote> <p>[<a href="http://www.blackfriday.info/sales/kmart-black-friday-ad.html">BlackFriday.info</a> via <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/03/kmart-black-friday-ad/">Crunchgear</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396206/kmart-black-friday-ad-leaked]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396206]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Kmart ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[black friday 2009]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Dealzmodo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:54:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396206&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ EcoModo - The Best of TreeHugger [Roundups] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This week on TreeHugger, the newest species of robo-fish, Google's PowerMeter partners with UK energy monitoring gadgets, the iPhone might be the Kindle killer, wind turbines that flap like bee wings, and more.</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/sharing-green-patents-eco-patent-commons-green-xchange.php">Sharing Green Patents: Eco-Patent Commons & Green Xchange</a></strong><br> Green patents are growing like mad, and it looks like there's no stopping their popularity.</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/flapping-wind-turbine-inspired-by-bumble-bee-wings.php">Flapping Wind Turbine Inspired by Bumble Bee Wings</a></strong><br> Green Wavelength, an up-and-coming California engineering biz, has prototyped a small wind turbine, the xBEE, the elegant flapping motion of which is inspired by the buzz of insect wings (see the video).</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/pollution-patrolling-robotic-fish-have-muscle-movement-like-real-fish.php">Pollution-Patrolling Robotic Fish Have "Muscle" Movement Like Real Fish</a></strong><br> Michigan State University researchers are bringing another version of a robotic fish to the scene, having just received funding to move the project forward. And these fish have some very life-like features.</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/the-next-real-kindle-killer-may-be-the-iphone.php">The Real Kindle Killer May Be the iPhone</a></strong><br> iPhone just might be a device for Kindle to really keep an eye on as a competitor. In September, the number of book-related apps sold for iPhones outpaced games for the first time, indicating that the iPhone is gaining popularity as a convenient device for ebook reading.</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/11/bike-light-tire-pump-recharges-while-pumping.php">Pimp Your Bike - Pump Your Light</a></strong><br> The PUYL serves both as a bicycle tire pump and as a headlight, an efficient combo it its own right. But it gets better: the PUYL's battery recharges while you pump!</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/10/zinc-air-battery-revolt-3-times-more-energy-lithium-ion-battery-electric-cars.php">Very Promising! Zinc-Air Battery Could Hold 300% More Energy Than Lithium-Ion</a></strong><br> ReVolt Technology, a company based in Staefa, Switzerland, claims that its Zinc-air battery can "store three times the energy of lithium ion batteries, by volume, while costing only half as much," and unlike other existing air batteries, this one would be rechargeable.</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/10/one-of-the-most-beautiful-radios-weve-ever-seen-and-its-made-for-treehuggers.php">One of the Most Beautiful Radios We've Ever Seen...And It's Made for TreeHuggers!</a></strong><br> Now this could top any greenie gadgeteer's holiday wish list. It is a gorgeous little wooden radio that - to top off its loveliness - is solar powered.</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/10/googles-powermeter-hits-the-uk-all-part-of-the-plan-for-smart-grid-global-domination.php">Google's PowerMeter Hits the UK. All Part of the Plan for Smart Grid Global Domination.</a></strong><br> By partnering with First:Utility and AlertMe, Google's home energy dashboard PowerMeter has just hit the UK, becoming available for residents to watch every last watt and cut back where possible.</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/10/savior-bud-sucks-moisture-from-trees-for-drinking-water.php">Savior Bud Sucks Moisture From Trees for Drinking Water</a></strong><br> For dry areas, every drop of drinking water is important. Moisture collectors are a big help, and this concept design, modestly called the Savior Bud, is one idea to help gather up moisture from a tree's respiratory process and create drinking water.</p> <p><strong><a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/10/a-digital-photo-frame-to-end-the-debate-over-electric-or-old-fashioned.php">A "Digital" Photo Frame To End The Debate Over Electric or Old Fashioned</a></strong><br> Meet the image.jpeg photo frame - touted as the "first ever analog "digital" photo frame,"</p> <p><em>TreeHugger's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/ecomodo/">EcoModo column</a> appears every Tuesday on Gizmodo.</em></p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396254/ecomodo-+-the-best-of-treehugger]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396254]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Roundups ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Treehugger]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:30:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaymi Heimbuch]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396254&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ A Surround Sound Speaker, Not a Dartboard [Home Theater] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_i24r3-portable-speaker_01_UWci2_17621.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #eopsi24r3portable" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/eopsi24r3portable/">EOps i24R3 Portable</a> isn't just the product of a design student and a 3D modeling program. It's a real, wireless, waterproof, single-speaker <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #surroundsound" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/surroundsound/">surround sound</a> system that was just announced by Hong Kong designer <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375758/stop-freaking-out-you-can-avoid-96-of-cellphone-radiation-with-the-moshimy-iphone-dock">Michael Young</a>. How does it work?</p> <p>The design is basically one sealed sound chamber filled with enough speakers for an authentic surround sound experience: four, 2.6-inch flat speakers and two, 4.5-inch passive radiator speakers. You'll find a 2x10W Class D amplifier squeezed in that shell as well.</p> <p>Plugging in or operating off a built-in lithium polymer battery, the i24R3 has no inputs, instead receiving signals over 2.4GHz wireless USB or A2DP Bluetooth&mdash;yes, from software like iTunes and devices like iPhones.</p> <p>And while we have no idea how it actually sounds or how much it actually costs, we have too many regularly-intoxicated friends with too good of access to aerodynamic implements to ever invest in one of our own. [<a href="http://www.michael-young.com/">Michael Young</a> via <a href="http://www.thedesignblog.org/entry/i24r3-portable-speaker-for-surround-sound-anytime-anywhere/">The Design Blog</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396069/a-surround-sound-speaker-not-a-dartboard]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396069]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Home Theater ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Eops]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[EOps i24R3 Portable]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[i24R3]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Michael Young]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Stereo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Surround Sound]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:20:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396069&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ You Won't Need Chairlifts with the Fastest Snow Car In the World [Cars] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nTDNLUzjkpg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nTDNLUzjkpg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object> I don't care that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #kenblock" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/kenblock/">Ken Block</a>'s new Subaru-based <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #traxsti" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/traxsti/">Trax STI</a> could be the fastest snow vehicle in the world. But if Brian manages to secure it for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5201167/snowmodo-reader-meetup-report">Snowmodo</a> 2010, I'll be there with my red Zissou hat.</p> <p>By "there" I mean that I would be driving snowboarders up and down Lake Tahoe's hills. And by "driving snowboarders up and down" I mean racing up to the mountain top and back to the mountain base. And with "mountain base" I really mean bar.</p> <p>I guess I won't be driving the Trax&mdash;with its 400hp engine, cat tracks, and four-snowboarder sleigh&mdash;a lot, after all. [<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/02/video-ken-blocks-subaru-based-trax-sti-is-an-alpine-badass/">Autoblog</a> via <a href="http://www.techeblog.com/index.php/tech-gadget/ken-block-s-trax-sti-is-world-s-fastest-snow-cat-vehicle">Techeblog</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396098/you-wont-need-chairlifts-with-the-fastest-snow-car-in-the-world]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396098]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Cars ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ken Block]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ken Block's TRAX STi]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Snowmodo]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[TRAX STI]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396098&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Android 2.0 Review: Almost Human [Review] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/hooooome.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_hooooome.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A year ago, Android was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062977/t+mobile-g1-google-android-phone-review">an unfinished OS</a> for nerds, bursting with potential. With <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #android20" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/android20/">Android 2.0</a>, it's evolved into something sleeker, more refined and focused&mdash;but still something not quite human.</p> <p>Over the last year, Android's evolved more rapidly and appeared in more shapes than any other smartphone OS. Every major update has made Android more capable and advanced, while custom interfaces from companies like HTC and Motorola, mean it's constantly and continually shifting shapes. When you look <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5062977/t+mobile-g1-google-android-phone-review">at the bucket of bolts everybody started with</a>, some of the oh-so-shiny end results were <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">kind of amazing</a>. Android 2.0 blows all of that away, and lays down a platform for the next year that's wildly more compelling, even as it retains a lot of the same fundamental weaknesses.</p> <h1>New Skin, Same Awkward Body</h1> <p>Android 2.0 is glossy&mdash;not in an Apple "the whole world is shiny and reflective" kind of way, but more like molded plastic for a collectible action figure. The cartoon whimsy&mdash;the classic Google rainbow of bright colors&mdash;are gone. The iconography, redrawn for high-res displays packed with tons of pixels, is smoother and sleeker, more subtle, and forces you to ask yourself, "Google designed this?"</p> <p>While icons and menubars have been polished to fine gloss, and some things are cleaner and better organized&mdash;settings, for instance&mdash;overall, the user experience is basically the same: three desktops, which you can pack with icons and widgets; the still brilliant drop-down notification shade, which pools everything Android wants to tell you; and a pop-up tab where all of your apps are at. This is all still fine, mostly, if a bit muddled.</p> <p>The reason that cluttered interface confusion is mostly fine is that multitasking with Android is addictive, and it's a better, easier-to-use implementation than any phone but the Pre. The window shade, a simple but powerful concept, is what makes it work. If I'm browsing the internet and get a message, I can pull the shade down, check the message, and go right back to browsing. Or flip over to messaging, reply, and get right back to browsing. At this, Android 2.0 excels, especially now that everything runs faster.</p> <p>The long press and menu button conventions are still used nearly everywhere throughout the OS, but almost always inconsistently. If you're trying to do something in-app and have no idea how, there's a good chance the action you're looking for is buried behind the menu button or a long press. But these controls do different things in almost every single app, and even sometimes in the same app, depending on the context.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/voicesearchcar.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Universal search, and in particular, voice commands which let you quickly access search, map or navigate with surprising accuracy (seriously, it deciphers my mumbling better than my mom), are probably the most significant improvements to usability. Universal search isn't quite as universal as we'd like, though. It only pores over apps, contacts, YouTube, music and the web&mdash;you have to go into the messaging and email apps separately to search through them, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense.</p> <p>And while Android 2.0 is <em>capable</em> of multitouch, other than making typing smoother, it's nowhere to be found, at least not where I want it: the browser and maps. Also, the portrait keyboard's still too tiny.</p> <h1>A Killer Machine, Sorta</h1> <p>Software is inextricably tied to hardware in many respects, and nowhere is that more true than performance. Droid, the first Android 2.0 phone&mdash;and the only one we've used&mdash;is ridiculously capable, with an ARM Cortex A8 <a href="http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtbu/wtbuproductcontent.tsp?templateId=6123&navigationId=12643&contentId=14649">TI OMAP3430 processor</a> that's <em>basically</em> the same as the chips inside of the Palm Pre and iPhone 3GS. Point being, it's got heavy duty processor firepower.</p> <p>So it's absolutely inexplicable that while it's overall the fastest version of Android yet&mdash;most apps <em>fly</em> open instantly, run zippily and practically zoom from one to another, even with a couple running in the background&mdash;very basic user interface elements, like the main pop-up menu on the home screen and sliding over from one desktop to another, often stutter or lag (with no apps running up front, and just a couple of widgets on the desktop). At this point, it's clear that these performance hiccups are an Android problem, not a hardware deficiency. It's maddening to hold a badass phone like the Droid and watch it handle menus like a pussy.</p> <h1>Accounts, Contacts, Exchange and Other Serious-Sounding Words</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/contacts.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_contacts.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Besides Google Maps Navigation Beta, Android 2.0's most significant upgrade for regular people is all about contacts and networking. Like the Palm Pre and HTC's Sense UI, it integrates contacts from multiple sources&mdash;namely, Facebook and Exchange (no Twitter yet). The scheme works exceptionally well, with finesse that's almost out of character for Google. The way it pulls in your Facebook contacts <em>actually makes sense</em>: When you add the account, you can choose to add all 900 of your Facebook contacts, or just the ones who you have actual Google contacts for. Oh, sweet reason! It even managed to match our address book contacts with correlating Facebook accounts pretty accurately and seamlessly, with a few exceptions.</p> <p>1. Everybody whose name is capitalized in the screenshot is matched up with Facebook&mdash;I loathe capital letters, but got over the inconsistency.<br> 2. And the rarely mismatched contacts prove difficult, if not impossible, to completely straighten out.</p> <p>Quick Contact is what keeps this orgy of personal information from getting too messy when it's time to get down to business&mdash;clicking on a contact's icon blooms a row of icons, letting you instantly ping them via SMS, phone, email, Facebook or whatever you want.</p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/accounts.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Android finally approaches a real smartphone when it comes to accounts. Multiple Google accounts and Exchange support come stock. What's that mean? Well, if you have a hosted Google apps account for work, and a personal one (like all of us at Giz do), you can use the awesome native Gmail application for both, instead of being forced to relegate one of the accounts to the separate, okay-but-not-as-good email app, which is what handles all of your Exchange, IMAP and POP mail. The only bummer is that you still have to toggle between each Google account mailbox in the Gmail app. (Yes, there are two different email applications. A Gmail app, and one for everything else. And they're completely different.)</p> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gmailbig2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_gmailbig2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>There's one serious limitation to the multiple Google account support: The only Google calendars that sync to the phone are the ones from your main Google account, not your secondary one. Exchange calendars, on the other hand, use the separate-but-equal-as-far-as-I-can-tell "Corporate Calendars" app. We tested Exchange support using mail2web's free service, and everything seemed to show up correctly, FWIW.</p> <h1>Maps</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/mapsandlayers.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_mapsandlayers.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The biggest change to Google Maps is Navigation, which Wilson Rothman, a Magellan for our time, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393935/google-navigator-for-android-review-good-for-free-but-far-from-perfect">reviewed extensively</a> here. My assessment is mostly the same after a weekend in a car&mdash;it's pretty good, but occasionally befuddling and hard to get around. A potential point of confusion is that Navigation is both integrated into Maps and also its own distinct app, unlike Latitude.</p> <p>Also new, sorta, is layers. Basically, every bit of information you wanna see in Maps is now a "layer." Like if I've got Latitude up on the map, and want to see nearby coffee places with satellite view, that's three layers&mdash;Latitude, a search for coffee, and satellite view. It can get a little confusing, especially if you're going from search to search or Maps to Navigation and then back to Maps&mdash;none of it's conceptually clean or simple, and the interface isn't always aren't entirely self-apparent. Also. Pinch. To. Zoom. I want it.</p> <h1>Browse Awesomer, But No (Multi)Touchy</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/browser.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_browser.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The browser's faster, smarter and more powerful, and is probably the second best browser now, next to mobile Safari. It mostly cuts through lardass sites like Gizmodo with pep previous versions didn't, with more responsive scrolling and panning (slowdown <em>does</em> happen though). The browser actually starts you out on each site with a view of the entire page now, which is nicer in theory, but then it makes you want to pinch to zoom in&mdash;which, like Maps, is not enabled. You're stuck with unwieldly buttons and double-taps that never quite line the page up the way they should. If Palm, who's an insect by comparison, can pinch and zoom with impunity, why can't Google? Don't say it's out of friendship, because Apple doesn't even like you guys anymore.</p> <h1>Well, It <i>Would</i> Be a Better Camera</h1> <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/droidcamera2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_droidcamera2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>More controls! Yay! White balance, focusing mode, color and more. It's just too bad that on the Droid, the camera's completely unresponsive garbage. I don't know if it's software or hardware, so I'm mentioning in it both here and in our Droid review. Fix please.</p> <h1>Multimedia, or the Lack Thereof</h1> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/music.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> The only way to get your music and videos on the phone is to manually drag and drop the files. There is no syncing, no easy way to get your music library onto your phone. How are normal people supposed to figure this out? Verizon reps actually joked about how putting music on the Droid is sure to make for a lovely Saturday afternoon. What. The. Shit.</p> <p><strike>And, there's not even a built-in video player! I have a phone with drop-dead gorgeous screen that I can't use to play movies without digging up my own video app, even if I could figure out how to get videos onto it.</strike> <strong>Correction</strong>: The video player's tucked inside of the slow and rather buggy Gallery application, where you also browse photos. And it wouldn't play videos that worked perfectly on a Zune HD or iPhone. Also, it and the music player are hideous.</p> <p>Until I can magically and perfectly sync 12 gigs of music and videos over the air, you can't get away with not having a media sync desktop application. And DoubleTwist, a third-party app that can sync to Android, doesn't really count, since it's not bundled with it. (<strong>Update</strong>: FWIW, if you know <a href="http://www.motorola.com/Consumers/US-EN/Consumer-Product-and-Services/Mobile+Phone+Accessories/Software/Motorola-Media-Link-US-EN">where to look</a>, Motorola offers a PC-only Media Link application for <em>its</em> Android phones. But it still doesn't solve the larger Android problem&mdash;Google needs to specify an easy-to-use syncing solution for people who need that.) Make no mistake, for a phone platform that's supposed to be ready for consumers now, this is a disaster, like a spaceship that's about to shoot into the atmosphere with a gaping hole in the side.</p> <h1>Goin' to the Android Market, Buyin' Some Apps</h1> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/markeettt.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />The Android Market has over 10,000 apps, and its state of the union is still a mixed bag. On the one hand, it's finally got official apps from Facebook, Amazon, Pandora and other critical names people expect on their phone. On the other, and almost universally, these apps aren't nearly as polished or full-featured as their iPhone counterparts (look no further than the Facebook app, which lacks even messaging in Android). And games? It's a pretty desolate wasteland, if you're looking for something beyond NES emulators. The library is getting better, and will undoubtedly keep getting better, but it's hard not to lament Android's comparative app ghetto, even as the platform's poised to explode. (<strong>Update</strong>: Another point I forgot to mention, and part of the reason Android games are limited in scope, is the storage limit for apps since they can't be installed on the SD card&mdash;for instance, it's 256MB on the Droid.)</p> <p>A problem that's currently plaguing the ecosystem, and is hopefully not a foreboding omen of the fragmentation to come, is that many apps weren't designed for the higher resolution screens that Android 2.0 supports, so their icons and graphics render crap-ugly on Droid, even in the main menu. (Granted, the phenomenon is partly Google's fault for restricting access to the 2.0 SDK to all but a select group of privileged developers until basically the day Droid was announced.)</p> <p>The Market itself, while it got a desperately needed facelift with 1.6, still has a ways to go. There's no way to update all of your applications simultaneously&mdash;you have to click through the update process for each one. And finding apps remains a problem. Browsing for apps exclusively on your phone is a tedious experience, especially when there's so many apps to wade through. Besides more refined browsing and suggestions, there needs to a way to look through the Market on your desktop. Also, Google's got this whole cloud thing going, why aren't my apps tied to my Google account, so if I move to another phone, they'll all magically repopulate it, like my contacts?</p> <h1>Wherefore Art Thou, Android?</h1> <p>I probably sound like I'm more down on Android 2.0 than I actually am. I like it a lot, truthfully. It's an amazing conduit for Google's services. If your online life is lock, stock and barrel Google, there really isn't a better or more powerful smartphone for getting stuff done in that universe. The Gmail app is a perfect distillation of Gmail for a small screen. The Google Talk app, if you have a bunch of friends using Gtalk, is fantastic. Google, really, is Android's greatest strength. Excellent multitasking is a close second.</p> <p>In time, Android very well could be <em>the</em> internet phone, hands down, in terms of raw capabilities. And while it's not as easy to use or polished or seamless as the iPhone&mdash;or to some extent, Palm's WebOS&mdash;it's way more usable than most other smartphones, and keeps evolving, way faster than anyone else, continually closing that gap. Android 2.0's potential finally feels as enormous as the iPhone's, and I get kinda tingly thinking about it. I can't say Android 2.0 is ready for your mom yet, but it's definitely ready for anybody reading this.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5395980,12,''); </script></p> <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3.jpg" width="20" height="20">Google's apps are simply awesome<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3.jpg" width="20" height="20">Facebook and Exchange integration works pretty well<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3.jpg" width="20" height="20">Second best mobile browser<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/giznormal.jpg" width="20" height="20">New look, same feel<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Multiple Google account support somewhat limited<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus.jpg" width="20" height="20">Still kinda sluggish at random intervals<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus2.jpg" width="40" height="20">No native way to sync music<br> <br clear="all"> <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus2.jpg" width="40" height="20">Crappy music and video player</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5395801]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Review ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[android 2.0]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Android 2.0 review]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Top]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Éclair]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395801&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ First Look at the Apple Stores' New Mutant EasyPay iPod Touches [Apple] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/IPODSTORE.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_IPODSTORE.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Since 2005, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #applestores" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/applestores/">Apple stores</a> have been ringing up purchases with wireless handheld point-of-sale terminals. This always felt a little odd, partly because you never see a register, but mostly because the devices run Windows. <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/03/exclusive_look_at_apples_new_ipod_touch_based_easypay_checkout.html">Not anymore!</a></p> <p>Apple is in the process of retiring their massive fleet of Windows CE handhelds, made by Symbol Technologies and introduced back in 2005, with custom-designed iPod Touches. The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5392308/remainders-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/2">initial announcement</a> made this sound like a self-satisfied, gloating move by Apple, during which they'd happily&mdash;and publicly&mdash;ditch their clunky, ugly, jury-rigged handhelds for sleek, shiny iPod Touches. But judging by these photos nabbed by <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/03/exclusive_look_at_apples_new_ipod_touch_based_easypay_checkout.html">AppleInsider</a>, this isn't quite the case.</p> <p><script type="text/javascript"> gawkerGallery(5396120,4,''); </script></p> <p>Apple's point-of-sale Touches take advantage of OS 3.0's hardware accessory support a <em>lot</em>. Each one will be wrapped in a large plastic case, which includes a barcode scanner up top and a card reader slot in the side, as well as an extra battery. The whole assemblage&mdash;iPod included&mdash;is powered through a mini USB port. Naturally, sales will be carried out with a custom iPhone app; not so naturally, credit card signatures need to be entered with a <em>stylus</em>, almost like you're using Windows Mobile (OH GOD!). Or, you know, paper.</p> <p>More pictures at [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/03/exclusive_look_at_apples_new_ipod_touch_based_easypay_checkout.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396119/first-look-at-the-apple-stores-new-mutant-easypay-ipod-touches]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396119]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Apple ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple Store]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Apple store ipod touch]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[apple stores]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Ipod touch pos]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:58:19 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396119&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Someone Stop The Fastest Robot Packager in the World at Once [Robots] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7iqHSlgpapY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7iqHSlgpapY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object> For some reason, I can't stop looking at the frenzy <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #adeptquattro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/adeptquattro/">Adept Quattro</a> robopackager, which reaches more than 300 cycles per minute. Go to 1:30 to see it running at full speed. Must. Close. Window.[<a href="http://ir.adept.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=419309">Adept</a> via <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.robotbuzz.fr%2Frobots-industriels%2Fquattro-record-robot-du-monde-de-vitesse%2F&sl=auto&tl=en&history_state0=">RobotBuzz</a> via <a href="http://www.botjunkie.com/2009/11/03/adept-quattro-is-fastest-ever-for-the-moment/">Botjunkie</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396067/someone-stop-the-fastest-robot-packager-in-the-world-at-once]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396067]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Robots ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Adept Quattro]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Packaging]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:40:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396067&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ DirecTV Uses a Few Other Dead Celebrity Spokesmen [Humor] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mwgxFCq1gbw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mwgxFCq1gbw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Man, if you thought it was tacky and gross when DirecTV used Chris Farley in their ads, you probably won't like the Heath Ledger, JFK or Jesus Christ spots. [<a href="http://landlinetv.com/videos/directv-hires-more-dead-celebrity-spokesmen">LandlineTV</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396093/directv-uses-a-few-other-dead-celebrity-spokesmen]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396093]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Humor ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[DirecTV]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:27:11 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396093&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Via Nano 3000 Wants to Rip Out the Eyes of the Intel Atom [Processors] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Via's latest nano processor, the 3000, has gone official today for a release in early 2010 in speeds ranging between 1 to 2GHz. The promise? 20% lower power consumption than old Vias, and 1080P playback. Intel's gotten cocky enough in the space that we don't mind the competition one bit. </p> <blockquote><p>VIA Introduces New <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #vianano3000" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #vianano3000" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/vianano3000/">VIA Nano 3000</a> Series Processors</p> <p>VIA's fastest and most power efficient processors yet deliver richest mobile and all-in-one desktop computing experience</p> <p>Taipei, Taiwan, 3 November 2009 - VIA Technologies, Inc, a leading innovator of power efficient x86 processor platforms, today introduced its new VIA Nano 3000 Series processors, bringing enhanced digital media performance and lower power consumption to Windows 7 thin and light notebook and all-in-one desktop PC markets.</p> <p>Based on the 64-bit superscalar ‘Isaiah' architecture, VIA Nano 3000 Series processors deliver the most compelling thin and light notebook computing experience with their rich HD entertainment capabilities, including support for flawless playback of high bit-rate 1080p HD video, as well as low power consumption resulting in longer battery life. </p> <p>With a host of advanced features including 64-bit support, advanced CPU virtualization technology, SSE4 for enhanced multimedia processing, and the industry-leading encryption and security capabilities integrated in the VIA PadLock™ Security Engine, VIA Nano 3000 Series processors also provide a secure, high-performance solution for emerging cloud-based computing environments.</p> <p>"With the VIA Nano 3000 Series, we are launching our fastest and most power-efficient processors yet," commented Richard Brown, VP International Marketing, VIA Technologies, Inc. "Coupled with our market-leading digital media chipsets, they enable the richest experience across a broad range of mobile and all-in-one system designs." </p> <p>VIA Nano 3000 Series</p> <p>VIA Nano 3000 Series processors are built on the successful 64-bit, superscalar architecture that powers the VIA Nano 1000 Series and 2000 Series processors, which have been adopted by leading OEMs worldwide for a growing number of market-leading mini-note, small form factor desktop, and energy-efficient server designs. </p> <p>Available at speeds from 1.0GHz to 2.0GHz, VIA Nano 3000 Series processors deliver up to 20% higher performance using up to 20% less power than current VIA Nano processors and boast a number of new features including support for the SSE4 multimedia instruction set and VIA VT virtualization technology.</p> <p>Fully compatible with all Microsoft operating systems, including the new Windows 7, as well as all popular Linux distributions, the VIA Nano 3000 Series processors use the NanoBGA2 package, making them pin-to-pin compatible with VIA Nano 1000 Series, VIA Nano 2000 Series, VIA C7, VIA C7-M and VIA Eden processors for easy upgrades of existing designs.</p> <p>VIA Nano 3000 Series Availability</p> <p>VIA Nano 3000 Series processor samples are currently available for OEMs and motherboard vendors, and will enter mass production in Q1 2010. </p></blockquote> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396089/via-nano-3000-wants-to-rip-out-the-eyes-of-the-intel-atom]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396089]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Processors ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[3000]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Nano]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[NetBooks]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Via]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Via nano 3000]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:19:55 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396089&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Make Your Own Secret Knock Detecting Door Lock [DIY] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/knock_lock.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_knock_lock.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hideouts can't be protected with a simple lock and key, those jobs require passwords or secret knocks. For the latter, you can go the extra mile and build a knock detector using a few basic pieces of equipment.</p> <p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zE5PGeh2K9k&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zE5PGeh2K9k&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p> <p>Steve Hoefer's secret knock detector is little more than a piezo speaker, a tiny gear reduction motor, an Arduino and some PVC pipe&mdash;basically a bunch of stuff he had lying around the lab. It works by keeping track of the time between a pattern of successive knocks. It's probably not the most secure way to lock a door, but Hoefer notes that there is a lot of room for improvement on this design. Besides making it small enough to actually fit in a doorknob, you could program it to accept a variety of knock patterns, including different knocks at different times of the day. Hit the link for instructions on how to build one yourself. [<a href="http://grathio.com/2009/11/secret-knock-detecting-door-lock.html">Grathio</a> via <a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/11/secret_knock_detector.html">Make</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396060/make-your-own-secret-knock-detecting-door-lock]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396060]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ DIY ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[arduino]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Clips]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[door lock]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Knock detecting door lock]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Lock]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Locks]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:00:00 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396060&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
        			
																							        			
																									<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Electronic Circuits That Melt Into Your Body [Medicine] ]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/thumb160x_silkimplant_x220.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />It makes me nervous too. I'm not so keen on the idea of circuits enveloped in a silk substrate, which melts into your body leaving just nanometers-thick layers of electronics. But it's for the best, trust me on this one.</p> <p>Until now, body-embedded circuitry was very limited. The electronics were hard, or had to be separated from the body. With this new technology, flexible circuits can be directly implanted anywhere in the body, protected by a cocoon of silk, which is human friendly. The silk melts away over time, leaving a small substrate of silicon circuitry inside that can't be noticed.</p> <p>This opens the door to things like LED tattoos, which can monitor and display sugar levels in the bloodstream, other kinds of sensors, and chips that connect to the nervous system. You know, so the government an their extraterrestrial allies can deactivate our will at any time and convert us into alien egg nests. [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/23847/?a=f">Technology Review</a>]</p> ]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5396063/electronic-circuits-that-melt-into-your-body]]></link>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5396063]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ Medicine ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[SILICON]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[Silicon-silk electronics]]></category>			
			<category><![CDATA[silk]]></category>			
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:48:21 -0500]]></pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
    			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5396063&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
    
			</channel>
</rss>